Appeal No. 1997-0092
Application No. 08/215,015
alcohol wines prepared by Lang’s process and appellant’s
processes. Accordingly, on the record before us, appellant’s
arguments are unsupported by evidence and as such are entitled
to little, if any weight.
Based on our consideration of the totality of the record
before us, we have weighed the evidence of obviousness found
in the teachings of Lang, Thumm and Gogel and appellants’
countervailing evidence of and argument for nonobviousness and
conclude that the claimed invention would have been obvious as
a matter of law under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007