THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 41
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte NARASIMHAN RAGHUPATHI,
PHILIP L. SCHELL, JAMES C. WATSON
and DAVID T. MELLE
_____________
Appeal No. 97-0139
Application 08/196,8191
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WEIFFENBACH, and PAK, Administrative
Patent Judges.
1Application for patent filed February 14, 1994.
According to applicants, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/759,966, filed September 16, 1991, abandoned;
which is a continuation of Application 07/548,439, filed July
5, 1990, abandoned; which is a continuation of Application
07/175,829, filed March 31, 1988, abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007