Ex parte RAGHUPATHI et al. - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 97-0139                                                                                                                     
                 Application No. 08/196,819                                                                                                             


                 JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                            

                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                           
                          This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                                                                        
                 final rejection of claims 1 through 5, 7 through 14, 16, 17,                                                                           
                 23 through 26, and 28 through 30.  Claims 18 through 22 are                                                                            
                 allowed.                                                                                                                               
                          Copies of representative claims 1 and 23 appear in an                                                                         
                 attached appendix to this decision.                                                                                                    
                          The references of record relied upon by the examiner are:                                                                     
                 Wong et al. (Wong)         3,920,313          Nov. 18, 1975                                                                            
                 Temple                     4,394,418          Jul. 19, 1983                                                                            
                 Sanzero et al. (Sanzero)   4,752,527          Jun. 21, 1988                                                                            
                 (filed Oct. 30, 1986)                                                                                                                  
                          The appealed claims now stand rejected  under 35 U.S.C.             2                                                         
                 § 103 over Sanzero in view of Temple and Wong.                                                                                         
                          We affirm.                                                                                                                    
                          The subject matter on appeal is directed to glass fibers                                                                      
                 having a dried residue of an aqueous treating composition on                                                                           
                 their surface.  The dried residue is produced when the glass                                                                           
                 fibers are coated with an aqueous treating (sizing)                                                                                    

                          2This rejection was imposed as a new ground of rejection                                                                      
                 in the answer.                                                                                                                         
                                                                           2                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007