Ex parte SHUDO et al. - Page 8




          Appeal No. 1997-0317                                                        
          Application No. 08/160,275                                                  

          prior art suggested the desirability of the combination, we                 
          will not sustain the Examiner’s rejection of claim 1.                       
                    The remaining claims on appeal also contain the                   
          above limitation discussed in regard to claim 1, i.e. an                    
          additional data output terminal, and therefore, we will not                 
          sustain the rejection as to these claims.                                   














                   We have not sustained the rejection of claims 1                   
          through 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  Accordingly, the Examiner's               
          decision is reversed.                                                       
                                     REVERSED                                         






                                          8                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007