Ex parte KIRIAKI et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1997-0583                                                        
          Application 08/368,680                                                      


          said plurality of slave sample and hold circuits comprising a               
          first slave input directly connected to said master output and              
          a first slave output and operable to sample a master signal                 
          from said master output and hold the value of said master                   
          signal on said first slave output for a second predetermined                
          period of time;                                                             

               a plurality of multiplexers, each comprising a plurality               
          of multiplexer inputs and a second output, ones of said second              
          outputs each coupled to one of said second multiplier inputs,               
          at least one of said plurality of multiplexer inputs of a                   
          first predetermined number of multiplexers coupled to a first               
          output of a first one of said slave circuits; and                           
               wherein the output of each of said multipliers is summed               
          so as to form said output of said FIR filter.                               
               The reference relied on by the Examiner is:                            
          Lish                5,050,119                Sept.  17, 1991                
               Claims 1 through 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103               
          over Lish and under obvious-type double patenting over claims               
          1 to 20 of S.N. 08/368,679.                                                 
               Reference is made to Appellants' brief and the Examiner's              
          answer for their respective positions.                                      
                                   OPINION                                            
               We have considered the record before us, and we will                   
          reverse the rejections of claims 1 through 20.                              
               With respect to claims 1 through 20, the Examiner has                  
          failed to set forth a prima facie case of obviousness.  It is               
                                         -3-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007