Appeal No. 97-0642
Application 08/242,318
Horodeck 4,544,276 October 1, 1985
Kato et al. (Kato) 5,168,533 December 1, 1992
Sklarew 5,365,598 November 15, 1994
(filed June 19,
1992)
Capps et al. (Capps) 5,367,453 November 22, 1994
(filed August 2,
1993)
Claims 11-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly
point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which
Applicant regards as his invention.
Claims 1-7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Sklarew and Kato.
Claims 8-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Sklarew and Kato, further in view of
Capps.
Claims 21-23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Capps and Kato.
- 3 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007