Ex parte VAN BOKHORST et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1997-0899                                                        
          Application No. 08/127,268                                                  


          doze state of relatively low power consumption after the                    
          broadcasting step and the identifying step is performed; and                
                    maintaining all non-selected stations that were                   
          identified in the identifying step in the awake state for at                
          least a time period beginning immediately after completion of               
          the operating step so that one or more data messages are able               
          to be transmitted to the non-selected stations which were                   
          identified in the identifying step.                                         
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Fujiwara                      4,794,649          Dec. 27, 1988              
          Mabey et al. (Mabey)          5,278,831          Jan. 11, 1994              
          (filed July 07,                                                             
          1992)                                                                       
          Messenger                     WO 92/19059         Oct. 29,                  
          1992                                                                        
          Claims 1-15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As                       
          evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Mabey in view of                
          Fujiwara with respect to claims 1, 2, 4, 6-9 and 13-15, and                 
          the examiner adds Messenger with respect to claims 3, 5 and                 
          10-12.                                                                      
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the                       
          examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for                
          the respective details thereof.                                             
          OPINION                                                                     
          We have carefully considered the subject matter on                          
          appeal, the rejections advanced by the examiner and the                     

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007