Appeal No. 1997-0899
Application No. 08/127,268
obviousness has not been established for the invention of
claims 5 and 12. Therefore, we do not sustain the rejection
of claims 5 and 12 as proposed by the examiner.
In summary, the rejection of claims 1-15 under 35
U.S.C. § 103 has been sustained with respect to claims 1-4, 6-
11 and
13-15, but has not been sustained with respect to claims 5 and
12. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims
1-15 is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
Kenneth W. Hairston )
13
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007