Ex parte FURLANI et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1997-0907                                                         
          Application 08/291,642                                                       




               Representative claim 1 is reproduced below:                             
               1.  A magnetically biased electromagnetic shuttering                    
          device for controlling the shutter blades of a camera, said                  
          device characterized by:                                                     
               a yoke comprising a core and a coil, said coil being                    
          capable of receiving current produces a first magnetic field                 
          existing inside and outside said core;                                       
               a movable magnet that is coupled to the shutter blades,                 
          said magnet having a second magnetic field and being                         
          positioned adjacent said core so that said second magnetic                   
          field interacts with said first magnetic field; and                          
               biasing means, separate from said yoke, for producing a                 
          third magnetic field, said biasing means is positioned                       
          adjacent said movable magnet in order to influence the motion                
          of said movable magnet and to provide controllable detents for               
          said movable magnet.                                                         

               The following references are relied on by the examiner:                 
          Shimada et al. (Shimada)            4,338,013                July            
          6, 1982                                                                      
          Wang                                4,973,866                Nov.            
          27, 1990                                                                     
          Castor et al. (Castor)        5,155,522                 Oct. 13,             
          1992                                                                         
               Claims 1 through 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                
          As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon Castor,                 
          further in view of Wang and Shimada.                                         



                                          2                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007