Appeal No. 1997-0907 Application 08/291,642 invention substantially as claimed except for the claimed biasing means (set forth in both independent claims 1 and 4 on appeal) and the means for adjusting (set forth only in independent claim 4 on appeal). We agree with this assessment of Castor, which is easily validated by a general assessment of the figures of this reference and appellants do not assert otherwise in the Brief and Reply Brief. In what appears to be a home position, Castor's disclosed armature comprises the core 12 and the coil 13 with a cylindrically shaped movable permanent magnet 16 therewithin comparable to the claimed yoke and movable magnet. The showing in the home position in Figure 1 is better indicated with respect to the attached shutter blades in Figure 4. A similar showing is present in the comparison between Figures 2 and 5, and 3 and 6 as to the bi- directional rotatability of the movable magnet 16 with respect to the different directioned current flows which may be caused to flow in the coil 13. This is succinctly set forth in the SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION at column 2. The various gaps shown in Figure 1 of Castor contribute to the orientation of the movable magnet 16 with respect to the electromagnet provided by the core 12 - coil 13 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007