Appeal No. 1997-0907
Application 08/291,642
artisan obviously would have led to the artisan seeing the
desirability of providing a screw-type adjustability of the
physical location of the angular bias magnet 30 with respect
to the other motor parts as depicted, for example, in Figure 2
of Wang for the advantages set forth in Shimada.
Appellants have presented no arguments with respect to
any dependent claim 2, 3, 5, and 6. Therefore, they all fall
with their parent claims 1 and 4. As such, the decision of
the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 6 under 35 U.S.C. §
103 is affirmed.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007