Appeal No. 1997-0918
Application 08/160,301
of claim 34, which is similar to the recitation in dependent
claims 33 and 35 in part. Claim 34 recites that the
arithmetic logic unit has a carry input to it, a feature which
is not taught or suggested or shown in either Yamaoka's Figure
3 or Zaidi's Figure 3. Therefore, we reverse the rejection of
this claim.
In view of the foregoing, we have sustained the rejection
of claims 1 through 8, 32, 33, 35 and 36, but have reversed
the rejection of dependent claim 34. Accordingly, the
decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
James D. Thomas )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007