THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL SCHLANSKER, RAMAKRISHNA RAU, and VINOD KATHAIL
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0923
Application No. 08/400,4141
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KRASS, BARRETT, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 21 through 47, which are all of the claims
pending in this application. In the Examiner's Answer (page
8), the examiner withdraws the rejection of claims 26 and 34.
Application for patent filed March 3, 1995. According to appellants,1
this application is a continuation of Serial No. 08/166,582, filed December
13, 1993, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007