Ex parte SCHULTZ - Page 1




                                                       Paper No. 20                   

               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                           
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                   _______________                                    
                              Ex parte DAVID P. SCHULTZ                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 97-0984                                   
                              Application 08/546,3451                                 
                                   _______________                                    
                                   ON BRIEF                                           
                                   _______________                                    
          Before JERRY SMITH, HECKER, and FRAHM, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   
                                                                                     
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. §                          
          134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-5, which                
          constitute all the claims in the application.  After the                    


               Application for patent filed October 20, 1995.  According to1                                                                     
          appellant, this application is a continuation of Application 08/194,552,    
          filed February 10, 1994.                                                    
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007