THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 56
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WILBUR D. JOHNSTON JR. and JUDITH A. LONG
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0988
Application No. 08/199,9101
____________
HEARD: October 20, 1999
____________
Before HAIRSTON, LALL, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed February 22, 1994.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/066,605, filed May 24, 1993, now abandoned;
which is a continuation of Application No. 07/808,989, filed
December 17, 1991, now abandoned; which is a continuation of
Application No. 07/515,545, filed April 26, 1990, now
abandoned; which is a continuation of Application No.
07/338,506, filed April 14, 1989, now abandoned; which is a
continuation of Application No. 07/101,303, filed September
25, 1987, now abandoned; which is a division of Application
No. 06/831,113, filed February 20, 1986, now U.S. Patent No.
4,716,130, issued December 29, 1987; which is a continuation-
in-part of Serial No. 06/544,215, filed
October 21, 1983, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007