THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHARVAKA DUVVURY
____________
Appeal No. 97-1048
Application No. 08/120,9981
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and FRAHM, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 21.
The disclosed invention relates to a method and apparatus
for protecting an integrated circuit from an externally
created high-energy pulse.
1Application for patent filed September 13, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007