THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ALBERT H. TADDIKEN and LUTZ J. MICHEEL
____________
Appeal No. 1997-1183
Application No. 08/066,3621
____________
HEARD: NOVEMBER 15, 1999
____________
Before THOMAS, GROSS, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1-8. The
examiner has indicated that claim 9 is allowable.
We AFFIRM-IN-PART - 37 CFR 1.196(b).
1Application for patent filed May 24, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007