Appeal No. 1997-1190 Application No. 08/427,972 317, 319 (CCPA 1968) ("When an invention, in its different aspects, involves distinct arts, that specification is adequate which enables the adepts of each art, those who have the best chance of being enabled, to carry out the aspect proper to their specialty."); Ex parte Zechnall, 194 USPQ 461, 461 (Bd. App. 1973) ("[A]ppellants' disclosure must be held sufficient if it would enable a person skilled in the electronic computer art, in cooperation with a person skilled in the fuel injection art, to make and use appellants' invention."). The examiner argues that the specification lacks the necessary details of the rotating electric coupling 12, the connecting socket 8, the socket connector 15, the subs 4 and 10, the pin connector 6, and the processing installation 13 (supplemental answer, pages 7 and 8). On pages 9 through 13 of the main brief, appellants argue that the structure of the electric couplings and subs are well known to persons of ordinary skill in the art. In support, the appellants refer to the disclosures of the patents and publications cited in the amendment filed December 15, 1994 (Paper No. 11). Appellants further point to pages 13 and 14 of the -8-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007