Appeal No. 1997-1190
Application No. 08/427,972
and 10. Accordingly, we will not sustain the standing 35
U.S.C. § 102 rejection of independent claims 1 and 10, or of
dependent claims 2, 4, 5 and 9, as being anticipated by
Bseisu.
The Rejection of Claims 3, 6, 8, 11, 14 and 16 through 29
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Bseisu in
view of Jeter in combination with Chevalier
We will also not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103
rejection of claims 3, 6, 8, 11, 14 and 16 through 29 as being
unpatentable over Bseisu in view of Jeter in combination with
Chevalier.
Claims 3, 6, 8 and 17 through 25 are dependent, directly
or indirectly, on claim 1 and contain all of the limitations
of claim 1. Claims 11, 14 and 26 through 29 are dependent,
directly or indirectly, on claim 10 and contain all of the
limitations of that claim. Independent claim 16 also requires
the claimed processing installation to comprise means for
processing of said measurement signals so that acquiring of
said measurement signals from said first and second measuring
means is synchronized in time as does claim 1. In addition,
-14-
Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007