Appeal No. 1997-1319
Application 08/290,227
development of the facts would seem to be warranted in this
case.
In summary, we have not sustained the examiner’s
rejection of the claims because of his misunderstanding of the
teachings of Guckel. Therefore, the decision of the examiner
rejecting claims 2-9, 11-15, 21-24, 26 and 27 is reversed.
REVERSED
STANLEY M. URYNOWICZ, JR. )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
JERRY SMITH ) BOARD OF
PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007