Ex parte KAGA et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1997-1412                                       Page 4           
          Application 08/139,888                                                      


                    a main assist gas nozzle at a center portion of                   
               the machining head for supplying a main assist gas;                    
               and                                                                    
                    at least one annular sub assist gas nozzle                        
               surrounding the main assist gas nozzle, a jet outlet                   
               at an innermost diameter of the annular sub assist                     
               gas nozzle being no smaller than a jet outlet of the                   
               main assist gas nozzle, for increasing pressure                        
               fluctuation and flow fluctuation of the main assist                    
               gas flow in comparison with the sub assist gas flow.                   


               The references relied on in rejecting the claims follow:               
          Babel et al.               5,149,937              Sep. 22,                  
          1992   (Babel)                                                              
          Hisayoshi                   2-263585              Oct. 26,                  
          1990.                                                                       
          (Japanese Patent)                                                           


               Claims 1, 6, 11, and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                 
          § 102(b) as anticipated by Babel.  Claim 1 stands rejected                  
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Hisayoshi.  Claims               
          6 and 23  stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over              
          Hisayoshi in view of Babel (Hisayoshi-Babel).  Rather than                  
          repeat the arguments of the appellants or examiner in toto, we              
          refer the reader to the briefs and answers for the respective               
          details thereof.                                                            









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007