THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 9
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JOHN E. HERMAN
__________
Appeal No. 1997-1461
Application 08/388,9151
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before DOWNEY, HANLON and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
DOWNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1-7 and 9-11. Claim 8 has been objected
to by the examiner as dependent on a rejected claim.
The subject matter on appeal is directed to a process of
recovering particulate silicon from a liquid by-product
1Application for patent filed February 15, 1995.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007