Ex parte HERMAN - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1997-1461                                                        
          Application 08/388,915                                                      


          stream.                                                                     


               Claim 1 is illustrative and reads as follows:                          
               1.  Method for recovering particulate silicon from a                   
          liquid by-product stream, the method comprising:                            
               (A) substantially separately a liquid stream comprising                
          particulate silicon, a metal salt, and a high-boiling silicon               
          containing compound having a boiling point higher than the                  
          sublimation temperature of the metal salt, into a liquid                    
          component and a particulate component where the particulate                 
          component comprises the particulate silicon, the metal salt,                
          and residual high-boiling silicon containing compound;                      
               (B) washing the particulate component with a solvent                   
          having a boiling point lower than the sublimation temperature               
          of the metal salt, thereby essentially separating the residual              
          high-boiling silicon containing compound from the particulate               
          component, and                                                              
               (C) recovering the particulate component by spray drying               
          at a temperature lower than the sublimation temperature of the              
          metal salt.                                                                 
               The references relied upon by the examiner are:                        
          Kotval et al. (Kotval)          4,195,067          Mar. 25,                 
          1980                                                                        
          Ritzer et al. (Ritzer)          4,892,694          Jan.  9,                 
          1990                                                                        
          Burgie et al. (Burgie)          5,118,486          Jun.  2,                 
          1992                                                                        
          Chadwick et al. (Chadwick)      5,326,896          Jul.  5,                 
          1994                                                                        
               Claims 1, 2, 4, 5 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §               
          103 as being unpatentable over Chadwick and appellant’s                     
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007