THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STEPHEN KURTIN, DANIEL E. FEDELE
and SAUL EPSTEIN
____________
Appeal No. 97-1697
Application No. 08/336,1701
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judges and
COHEN and PATE III, Administrative Patent Judges.
PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner's refusal to allow
claims 1 through 3, 8 through 10, 22, 23, 26, and 27 as
amended after the final rejection. Claims 5, 6, 12, 14
through 21, 25, and 28 through 32 have been indicated as
1Application for patent filed November 08, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007