Ex parte POLLARD - Page 10




          Appeal No. 97-1758                                        Page 10           
          Application No. 08/326,721                                                  


          the claimed motor is fixedly mounted to the carriage, Lissner               
          teaches a motor that is rotatably mounted.  (Appeal Br. at 13-              
          14.)                                                                        


               We find that the reference separately or in combination                
          with Fago fails to suggest the means for fixedly mounting of                
          claims 1 and 15 or the corresponding step of fixing the motor               
          of claim 8.  Claims 1 and 15 recite in pertinent part a “means              
          for fixedly mounting the motor to the carriage in a position                
          dictated by the spring force and the belt tension.”  (Appeal                
          Br., App. A at 1, 5.)  Claim 8 recites in pertinent part                    
          “fixing the motor to the carriage.”  (Id. at 3.)                            


               Lissner teaches in pertinent part attaching a drive motor              
          24 to the base of a disk file.  The motor is attached to a                  
          motor mount plate 50, which pivots about a pivot point 54.                  
          With a spring 52 attached thereto, the plate “serves to                     
          tension” a belt 44 against the motor and a pulley 18 of a                   
          cartridge 10.  Col. 5, ll. 61-67.                                           










Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007