Appeal No. 97-1758 Page 4
Application No. 08/326,721
(filed June 10,
1994)
Jadrich et al. (Jadrich) 5,392,662 Feb.
28, 1995
(filed Sept. 20, 1993).
Claims 13 and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
as anticipated by Wanger. Claims 1, 4-8, and 15 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Fago in view of
Lissner. Claims 3 and 16 stand rejected under § 103 as
obvious over Fago in view of Lissner further in view of
Glover. Claims 9-12 and 19-22 stand rejected under § 103 as
obvious over Dimitri in view of Fago and Lissner further in
view of Jadrich. Claim 16 stands rejected under § 103 as
obvious over Fago in view of Lissner further in view of
Glover. Claims 17 and 19 stand rejected under § 103 as
obvious over Fago in view of Lissner, Dimitri, and Jadrich
further in view of Wanger. Rather than repeat the arguments
of the appellant or examiner in toto, we refer to the appeal
brief and the examiner’s answer for the respective details
thereof.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007