Appeal No. 97-2020
Application 07/957,107
inputting into a pixel of said display one or more
pulses, each pulse having a pulse height and a pulse duration
depending upon a desired gradation level of the display at
said pixel,
wherein each of said one or more pulses has a rela-
tive pulse duration selected from the group consisting of 1,
2, @@@ 2 and has a relative pulse height selected from thek
group con- sisting of 0, 1, 2, @@@ I so that the pulse duration
and the pulse height of said pulses are both varied whereby
the minimum width of said pulses can be increased.
The Examiner relies on the following references:
De Jule 4,130,777 Dec. 19, 1978
Williams 4,427,978 Jan. 24, 1984
Claims 14 through 16 and 2 through 7 stand rejected
provisionally under the judicially created doctrine of
obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over
claims 1 and 12 of copending application Serial No.
07/957,106. Claims 2 through 7, 14 and 15 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the
admitted prior art found in the Appellants' specification on
pages 1 through 7, and De Jule. Claim 16 stands rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the admitted
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007