Appeal No. 97-2020 Application 07/957,107 Upon a careful review of De Jule, we find that De Jule is a plasma-sac-type gas-discharge image display panel which does not have an active switching element at each pixel. Thus, De Jule is not concerned with the problem confronted by Appellants. Appellants are concerned with an active matrix display which would have voltage variations or fluctuations due to the different active elements at each picture element as well as the parasitic capacitance due to the active elements at each picture element. The Federal Circuit states that "[t]he mere fact that the prior art may be modified in the manner suggested by the Examiner does not make the modification obvious unless the prior art suggested the desirability of the modification." In re Fritch, 972 F.2d 1260, 1266 n.14, 23 USPQ2d 1780, 1783-84 n.14 (Fed. Cir. 1992), citing In re Gordon, 733 F.2d 900, 902, 221 USPQ 1125, 1127 (Fed. Cir. 1984). In addition, the Federal Circuit reasons in Para-Ordnance Mfg., 73 F.3d at 1088-89, 37 USPQ2d at 1239-40, that for the determination of 10Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007