Ex parte YAMAZAKI et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 97-2020                                                          
          Application 07/957,107                                                      



                    Upon a careful review of De Jule, we find that                    
          De Jule is a plasma-sac-type gas-discharge image display panel              
          which does not have an active switching element at each pixel.              
          Thus, De Jule is not concerned with the problem confronted by               
          Appellants.  Appellants are concerned with an active matrix                 
          display which would have voltage variations or fluctuations                 
          due to the different active elements at each picture element                
          as well as the parasitic capacitance due to the active                      
          elements at each picture element.                                           




                    The Federal Circuit states that "[t]he mere fact                  
          that the prior art may be modified in the manner suggested by               
          the Examiner does not make the modification obvious unless the              
          prior art suggested the desirability of the modification."  In              
          re Fritch, 972 F.2d 1260, 1266 n.14, 23 USPQ2d 1780, 1783-84                
          n.14 (Fed. Cir. 1992), citing In re Gordon, 733 F.2d 900, 902,              
          221 USPQ 1125, 1127 (Fed. Cir. 1984).  In addition, the                     
          Federal Circuit reasons in Para-Ordnance Mfg., 73 F.3d at                   
          1088-89, 37 USPQ2d at 1239-40, that for the determination of                

                                          10                                          





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007