Ex parte MANNAVA - Page 12




                 Appeal No. 1997-2075                                                                                    Page 12                        
                 Application No. 08/362,362                                                                                                             


                 utilizes a black paint coating to prevent a recast layer from                                                                          
                 forming and an alternative nonpreferred embodiment in which                                                                            
                 the black paint coating is omitted and a recast layer forms on                                                                         
                 the surface.4                                                                                                                          


                          For the reasons stated above, the decision of the                                                                             
                 examiner to reject claim 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed.                                                                          


                 Claims 10 to 15 and 20                                                                                                                 
                          In accordance with 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7), we have selected                                                                     
                 claim 10 as the representative claim from the appellant's                                                                              
                 grouping of claims 10 to 15 and 20 to decide the appeal on                                                                             
                 this rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  See page 7 of the                                                                               
                 appellant's brief.                                                                                                                     


                          With respect to dependent claim 10, the examiner further                                                                      
                 determined (final rejection, p. 4) that                                                                                                
                          it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in                                                                        
                          the art at the time the invention was made to use the                                                                         

                          4One is not taught away from a nonpreferred embodiment by                                                                     
                 a preferred embodiment.  See In re Susi, 440 F.2d 442, 446, n.                                                                         
                 3, 169 USPQ 423, 426, n. 3 (CCPA 1971).                                                                                                







Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007