Ex parte UCHIYAMA et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                       
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)               
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                  
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                          
                                                             Paper No. 21              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                      __________                                       
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                      __________                                       
           Ex parte MASAAKI UCHIYAMA, TARO UYAMA,                                      
                     YOSHIKO MATSUMURA and NOBUYUKI ICHIMARU                           
                                      __________                                       
                                 Appeal No. 1997-2478                                  
                               Application 08/361,5541                                 
                                     ___________                                       
                                       ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                       

          Before FRANKFORT, STAAB and GONZALES, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                      
          STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final               
          rejection of claims 18-39, all the claims in the application.                
               Appellants’ invention pertains to a suspension control                  


               1Application for patent filed December 22, 1994.                        
                                           1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007