THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal
and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 49
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte PIETER G. MARKUS
__________________
Appeal No. 97-2626
Application 08/234,5021
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before: McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
SCHAFER and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
The appeal is from a decision of the Examiner rejecting
1
Application for patent filed April 28, 1994. According to
appellant, the application is a continuation of Application 08/033,947, filed
March 18, 1993, which is a continuation of Application 07/818,413, filed
January 6, 1992, which is a continuation of Application 07/504,188, filed
April 3, 1990.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007