Ex parte MARKUS - Page 3




          Appeal No. 97-2626                                                          
          Application 08/234,502                                                      
                    said means for urging urges said partially                        
               introduced object simultaneously towards one side of the               
               loading aperture and towards an adjoining further side so              
               that said partially introduced object is urged towards a               
               corner between the adjoining sides,                                    
                    said tolerance field is situated diametrically                    
               opposite to said corner, and                                           
                    said detection means operates exclusively in said                 
               tolerance field.                                                       
                            The 35 U.S.C. § 112 rejection                             
                    3.   The examiner has rejected claims 49-52 and 57-65             
          under the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112 for an alleged                   
          failure of the specification to provide an enabling disclosure              
          to make and/or use the “means for urging”.  (Examiner’s                     
          Answer, Paper 43, pages 4 and 5).                                           
                    4.   The examiner alleges that the specification as               
          it applies to the description of figures 3 and 7, fails to                  
          adequately teach how the “means for urging”, shown as springs               
          3a-3c is:                                                                   
                         a.   “initially positioned to commence urging of             
          the partially-inserted object toward one side/corner” (id. at               
          4);                                                                         
                         b.   “reset”(id. at 4-5); and                                
                         c.   “activated” (id. at 5).                                 
                    5.   The examiner further alleges that given the                  
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007