THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 46
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT HORTON, JEAN-JACQUES GRIMAUD, DANIEL MADDY, and
MICHAEL TEITEL
____________
Appeal No. 97-2764
Application No. 08/354,0181
____________
HEARD: March 12, 1999
____________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 22 through 37, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.
Application for patent filed December 05, 1994. According to1
appellants, the application is a continuation of Application 08/155,359, filed
October 06, 1993; which is a continuation of Application 07/863,312, filed
March 20, 1992; which is a continuation of 07/621,447, filed November 30,
1990, all abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007