Ex parte HORTON et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 97-2764                                                          
          Application No. 08/354,018                                                  


               Claims 22, 27, 36, and 37 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Krieg.                                     
               Claims 23 through 25, 28 through 30, 33, and 35 stand                  
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                   
          Krieg in view of Zimmerman.                                                 




               Claims 32 and 34 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as               
          being unpatentable over Krieg in view of Zimmerman and Mori.                
               Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 34,              
          mailed October 02, 1996) and the supplemental Examiner's                    
          Answer (Paper No. 37, mailed February 12, 1997) for the                     
          examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejections,                 
          and to the appellants' Brief (Paper No. 33, filed August 06,                
          1996) and Reply Brief (Paper No. 35, filed December 02, 1996)               
          for the appellants' arguments thereagainst.                                 
                                       OPINION                                        
               As a preliminary matter, we note that appellants indicate              
          on pages 5-6 of the Brief that with respect to the obviousness              
          rejections the claims at bar are not to be treated as standing              
          or falling together.  The claims are grouped as follows: 1)                 
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007