THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KEVIN D. HUNTER and ARNO MULLER
____________
Appeal No. 97-2877
Application No. 08/334,0961
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 5.
The disclosed invention relates to a postage metering
system.
1Application for patent filed November 4, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007