Appeal No. 97-2877 Application No. 08/334,096 DECISION The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b), and 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) is reversed because neither of the applied references discloses “each and every limitation” of the claimed invention.4 REVERSED JAMES D. THOMAS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ANITA PELLMAN GROSS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 4 Glaxo Inc. v. Novopharm Ltd., 52 F.3d 1043, 1047, 34 USPQ2d 1565, 1567 (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 988 (1995). 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007