THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CRAIG C. SUNDBERG and ROBERT H. MARTTER
____________
Appeal No. 97-3030
Application No. 08/254,1811
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KRASS, BARRETT, and HECKER, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision from the final rejection of claims 1,
5, 7, 8, 11 through 15 and 17 through 19. Claims 2, 3, 6, 10
and 16 have been withdrawn as being directed to a nonelected
invention. Claims 4 and 9 have been cancelled.
1Application for patent filed June 6, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007