THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte WALTER C. SEELBACH __________ Appeal No. 97-3082 Application 08/650,0231 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judges. KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 and 4. Claims 6 through 8 have been allowed and 1Application for patent filed May 17, 1996. According to appellant, this application is a continuation of Application 08/301,093, filed September 6, 1994, now abandoned. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007