Appeal No. 97-3173 Application No. 08/462,310 pending in this application.2 We REVERSE. According to appellants, the invention is directed to a golf shoe having a sole portion including a heel section, a shank section, a metatarsal section and a toe section and a spike socket frame embedded in and extending throughout all sections of the sole portion (brief, page 2). Claim 43 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and is reproduced below:3 43. A golf shoe comprising: a sole portion having heel, shank, metatarsal and toe sections; and a single frame embedded in the sole and extending across all sections, wherein the frame includes a plurality of spike sockets that are located in each of the sections and are approximately planar, and wherein the frame further includes rod shaped ribs that interconnect each of the spike sockets to at least two other spike sockets. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Claim 43 was amended and claims 27 through 42 and 46 were canceled,2 subsequent to the final rejection. See Paper No. 15. Claim 43 as reproduced in the "Appendix" to appellants' brief is3 incorrect. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007