Appeal No. 1997-4000 Application 08/319,004 Petruccelli. Claims 3 and 8 require the affixation of a pad of relatively soft material to the surface of the elastomeric golf club head opposite its striking surface. Notwithstanding the appellants’ arguments to the contrary (see page 8 in the main brief), Petruccelli’s disclosure of polyurethane back cushion 24 meets the limitations in these claims. We shall not sustain, however, the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claim 4 as being unpatentable over Petruccelli in view of Kobayashi. As conceded by the examiner (see page 4 in the answer), Petruccelli does not meet the limitations in claim 4 requiring the surface opposite the striking surface of the golf club head to have a recessed area with a relatively soft pad positioned in and affixed thereto. Kobayashi’s disclosure of a golf club head 11, 13 having a recess in its back surface to accommodate a metallic weight plate 20 (see Figure 5) does not 11Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007