Ex parte CRAWFORD et al. - Page 11




          Appeal No. 1997-4000                                                        
          Application 08/319,004                                                      


          Petruccelli.                                                                
               Claims 3 and 8 require the affixation of a pad of                      
          relatively soft material to the surface of the elastomeric                  
          golf club head opposite its striking surface.  Notwithstanding              
          the appellants’ arguments to the contrary (see page 8 in the                
          main brief), Petruccelli’s disclosure of polyurethane back                  
          cushion 24 meets the limitations in these claims.                           





               We shall not sustain, however, the standing 35 U.S.C. §                
          103 rejection of claim 4 as being unpatentable over                         
          Petruccelli in view of Kobayashi.                                           
               As conceded by the examiner (see page 4 in the answer),                
          Petruccelli does not meet the limitations in claim 4 requiring              
          the surface opposite the striking surface of the golf club                  
          head to have a recessed area with a relatively soft pad                     
          positioned in and affixed thereto.  Kobayashi’s disclosure of               
          a golf club head 11, 13 having a recess in its back surface to              
          accommodate a metallic weight plate 20 (see Figure 5) does not              


                                          11                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007