THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte KURT L. GROSSMAN
________________
Appeal No. 98-0026
Application 08/536,3041
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before COHEN, ABRAMS and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
This case comes before us again on request by the
appellant for rehearing of our decision mailed September 17,
1998, wherein we refused to sustain the examiner’s Section 112
Application for patent filed September 26, 1995.1
According to appellant, the application is a division of
Application 08/192,171, filed February 4, 1994.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007