Appeal No. 1998-0490
Application 08/543,057
for a vehicle window, to a sunshield, and to a method of
manufacturing a sunshield for an automobile windshield. An
understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading
of exemplary claims 1, 9, and 14, copies of which appear in
the APPENDIX OF CLAIMS (main brief, Paper No. 13).
As evidence of anticipation and obviousness, the examiner
has applied the documents listed below:
Romano 4,083,395 Apr. 11, 1978
Moll 4,947,920 Aug. 14,
1990
Kim 5,267,599 Dec. 7,
1993
The following rejections are before us for review.
Claims 1 and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
as being clearly anticipated by Moll.
Claims 4, 9, and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103(a) as being unpatentable over Moll.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007