Appeal No. 1998-0490 Application 08/543,057 the transverse dimension or height of a vehicle windshield). In our opinion, the content of claims 1 and 14 is simply not anticipated by the invention of Moll. Unlike the claimed invention, Moll explicitly requires a quadrafoldable (Fig. 3c) windshield sunshade (Figs. 1 and 2) having longitudinal creases or folds on its interior surface (column 1, lines 57 through 61 and column 2, line 67 to column 3, line 1). In fact, Moll expressly points out that the longitudinal folds are not transverse accordion folds (column 3, lines 29 through 32). For these reasons, the anticipation rejection of appellant’s claims is not sound, and must be reversed. The obviousness issues We reverse the rejection of claims 4, 9, and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Moll. At the outset, we note that independent claim 9, akin to claims 1 and 14 discussed above, requires a plurality of creases defining sides of planar elements that extend from the 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007