THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte FELIX TITZ and HANS MOSBURGER
________________
Appeal No. 1998-0514
Application 08/523,9071
________________
HEARD: OCTOBER 7, 1999
________________
Before COHEN, STAAB and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-5 and 9. No other claims are currently
1Application for patent filed September 6, 1995.
According to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application 08/159,140, filed November 30, 1993, now
abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007