THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JAMES P. PETERSON
__________
Appeal No. 1998-0566
Application 08/396,0051
__________
HEARD: Oct. 20, 1999
__________
Before MCCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, ABRAMS
and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner
finally rejecting claims 1-8 and 11-13. Claims 9, 10, 14 and
15 have been allowed. The appellant's invention is directed
1Application for patent filed February 28, 1995.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007