Appeal No. 1998-0566
Application No. 08/396,005
with Fan. Since the appellant has elected to group these two
claims with claim 11 (Brief, page 3), they fall therewith.
SUMMARY
The rejection of claims 1 and 4 as being anticipated by
Kanzelberger is not sustained.
The rejection of claims 2 and 3 as being unpatentable
over Kanzelberger is not sustained.
The rejection of claim 5 as being unpatentable over
Kanzelberger and Smith is not sustained.
The rejection of claims 6 and 7 as being unpatentable
over Kanzelberger and Rader is not sustained.
The rejection of claim 8 as being unpatentable over
Kanzelberger, Rader and Fan is not sustained.
The rejection of claim 11 as being unpatentable over
Kanzelberger and Rader is sustained.
The rejection of claims 12 and 13 as being unpatentable
over Kanzelberger in view of Rader and Fan is sustained.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.
13
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007