Ex parte PETERSON - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 1998-0566                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/396,005                                                                                                             

                 to a badge.  The claims on appeal have been reproduced in an                                                                           
                 appendix to the Brief.                                                                                                                 
                                                               THE REFERENCES                                                                           
                          The references relied upon by the examiner to support the                                                                     
                 final rejection are:                                                                                                                   
                 Rader et al. (Rader)                                  5,283,966                                    Feb.  8,                            
                 1994                                                                                                                                   
                 Kanzelberger                                          5,305,538                                    Apr. 26,                            
                 1994                                                                                                                                   
                 Fan                                                   5,406,726                                    Apr. 18,                            
                 1995                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                (filed Jun. 24, 1994)                                                   
                 Smith                                                 5,410,827                                    May   2,                            
                 1995                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                         (filed Jan. 28, 1993)                                          
                                                              THE REJECTIONS2                                                                           
                          Claims 1 and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as                                                                     
                 being anticipated by Kanzelberger.                                                                                                     
                          Claims 2 and 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                                                                        
                 being unpatentable over Kanzelberger.                                                                                                  


                          2In response to five rejections under the judicially                                                                          
                 created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting based                                                                            
                 upon Kanzelberger U.S. Patent No. 5,305,538, entered by the                                                                            
                 examiner in Paper No. 14, the appellant filed a terminal                                                                               
                 disclaimer (Paper No. 16).  In view of the examiner’s comments                                                                         
                 (Paper No. 17), we consider these rejections to have been                                                                              
                 withdrawn, leaving before us only the rejections under                                                                                 
                 Sections 102 and 103.                                                                                                                  
                                                                           2                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007