Appeal No. 98-0608 Page 7 Application No. 08/413,284 102 rejection with regard to claim 16 are not alleviated by evaluating Alvord in the light of the test for obviousness,2 or by considering the additional teachings of Wiederkehr. We therefore will not sustain this rejection. SUMMARY None of the rejections are sustained. The decision of the examiner is reversed. 2The test for obviousness is what the combined teachings of the prior art would have suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art. See In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425, 208 USPQ 871, 881 (CCPA 1981).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007