Ex parte ABRAMS et al. - Page 9

          Appeal No. 1998-0805                                                        
          Application No. 08/599,508                                                  


          also fail to cure the basic problem with Wilke, for none                    
          disclose or teach the claimed first air flow passageway.  This              
          being the case, the rejections of dependent claims 2, 4-6, 17,              
          20 and 24-33 also will not be sustained.                                    
                                      SUMMARY                                         
               None of the rejections are sustained.                                  
               The decision of the examiner is reversed.                              


                                      REVERSED                                        




                    HARRISON E. McCANDLISH             )                              
                    Senior Administrative Patent Judge                                
                    )                                                                 
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                    JAMES M. MEISTER                   )     APPEALS                  
                    Administrative Patent Judge        )       AND                    
                                                       )  INTERFERENCES               
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                    NEAL E. ABRAMS                     )                              
                    Administrative Patent Judge        )                              


          bae                                                                         
                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007