THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte CLYDE N. RICHARDS
__________
Appeal No. 98-0956
Application 08/385,3311
___________
HEARD: May 3, 1999
___________
Before COHEN, ABRAMS and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims
1, 3 to 8 and 10 to 23. No other claims are currently pending.
“The present invention concerns devices for producing liquid droplets having large
quantities of electric charge, which charged droplets are useful in gas cleaning machines
1Application for patent filed February 8, 1995.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007